- Psion donations to Owen

- RE: 9300/9500

- regarding bounced mails # 945_1

- Digest SPAM?

- Compuserve Classic Login,

- Adam's Hitchiker's Guide,

- Owen

Date: 22 Jun 2006 07:34:56 +0700
From: U Hornstein <address truncated>
Subject: Psion donations to Owen

Hello list members,
in digest 943, there were several offers of Psion donations to Owen. I forwarded this digest to Owen's mother. I think that Owen will soon have the time to consider these nice offers. Until then I will continue to forward other eventual offers from this list to him.

Owen got his new passport and will arrive today (Friday) in Norway and meet his family.
--
Greetings,
Ulrich Hornstein
http://psion.uh-lab.de

Date: 22 Jun 2006 07:55:22 +0700
From: Jon Welford <address truncated>
Subject: RE: 9300/9500

Hi Timothy,
Funny you should have seen that I'm sure mine had it for a while but it went away on it's own. I couldn't find anything about it either!

Is there a way of printing from the 9500 if you don't have an HP printer i.e. like the Psion print via pc.

Also I made up two documents in word with an embedded spreadsheet as epoc apps but the 9500 now says it has no application that can open them. What is going on?

Re contacts files I had no problems removing the unwanted files after synching them across from outlook. Could they be on the sim and protected there?

Cheers Jon Welford

Date: 22 Jun 2006 09:11:12 +0700
From: Vlad A <address truncated>
Subject: regarding bounced mails # 945_1

> Rolf Vonau regarding bounced mails

a completely innocent email of mine to a group of friends was marked as "spam". Mails I become from various mailing-lists get labelled as spam in Entourage. My suspicion is that too many successive blanks in the body, non-letter glyphs are considered suspicious. I you don't mind, as far as I'm concerned this (off)topic could remain here...

best,

vlad a

Date: 22 Jun 2006 10:41:16 +0700
From: Marcus von Cube <address truncated>
Subject: Digest SPAM?

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:50:13 +0800, The Digest wrote:

>One of ISP told us, that we have to comply to the standards described
>in RFC 2822, an other one told us, that the subscribers have to enter
>a PTR-record for our IP address in the DNS,
>
>whatever this means.

Ich bin kein Experte, aber ich habe ein Paar Infos und Ideen für dich.

RFC 2822 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html) beschreibt allgemein
das Format einer Mail mit den ganzen Header-Feldern und deren
Formatierung. Ein allgemeiner Hinweis, man möge sich daran halten ist
ziemlich blöd, das solte jedes E-Mail-Programm von selbst tun.

Der Hinweis auf den PTR-Record im DNS hilft auch nicht weiter. Diese
Records enthalten allgemein die Zuordnung von IP-Adressen zu Namen. Da
der Mail-Server, der die Mail verschickt (in diesem Fall Google-Mail)
natürlich einen DNS-Eintrag hat, gibt es logischerweise auch einen
PTR-Record dazu. Es gibt neue E-Mail-Verfahren, die bestimmte
*zusätzliche* DNS-Einträge benutzen, um SPAM einzudämmen, eine Art
"Darf dieser Server Mail von dem-und-dem verschicken, aber die Details
kenne ich nicht. Möglicherweise funktioniert das mit dem "verkehrten"
From:-Eintrag nicht richtig.

Manche Messages (deine zum Beispiel) kommen auch ziemlich zerfleddert
bei mir an, da stört sich wohl irgendeine Instanz an der Zeilenlänge
und macht Leerzeilen dazwischen:

>I would like to discuss this matter with an email expert, to avoid the
>further bouncing e.g.
>
>by changing the email header or the sending procedure.

Ich habe Google-Mail in Verdacht. Wer verschickt momentan den Digest,
und wie?

Marcus

http://www.mvcsys.de

Date: 22 Jun 2006 13:53:04 +0700
From: Itamar Engelsman <address truncated>
Subject: Compuserve Classic Login,

Answer to: Jakfish

Re.: Compuserve Classic Login - Sorry to be insistent but _when_ did this script last work for you ? Are you sure it still works ?


Best regards,
Itamar Engelsman
London, UK

Date: 22 Jun 2006 13:53:05 +0700
From: Itamar Engelsman <address truncated>
Subject: Adam's Hitchiker's Guide,

Answer to: Mike Dyer

Re.: Adam's Hitchiker's Guide - Was my English not clear or were you joking ?  Of course I meant to send the answer to the digest so the other 700 subscirbers can read it in the digest .... anyhow, I did not castigate anyone, just thought it wise to mention it.


Best regards,
Itamar Engelsman
London, UK

Date: 22 Jun 2006 13:58:14 +0700
From: Rolf Vonau <address truncated>
Subject: Owen

Hi all,

we got the b.m. mail from a subscriber concerning Owen's disaster.
We still don't want to censor the digest, but we want to ask you to bear in mind this message and to contact Owen
directly about further donations of hardware or money.

Thank you for your understanding

Rolf Vonau
The Digest Team

-------------- Forward Header ---------------
Subject: Owen
From:<address truncated>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:37:40

Hello Rolf,
It's a sad story about Owen, but I understand that the digest team will not or can't censor the messages into the digest. But I don't see the value of such item into the digest for the ER-OS community.

I thought that the digest is a news letter or a question letter for our Epoc OS.

How to treat such personal items is a principal question for the digest team.

I don't know who Owen is, is he famous in the Epoc community? Sorry Rolf, but this is the way I see this item.

BTW. I read the last digest, now I know a little bit more about Owen, but today it's Owen tomorrow it's an other one, so where is the end?

Talk with the digest team, about Owen and my standpoint and make your principal choice if the digest team put such items in the digest or not.

Regards,

Kees vd Straten.